Categories
Uncategorized

gentoo vs arch performance

), -O1, -O2, -O3 optimization, etc.If you accept one of the default flags, Gentoo downloads binaries from the server. Installation must be done manually by following instructions in the handbook. Подключаюсь с Linux (Gentoo). Why I use Gentoo Linux (and if you develop software you should too) I first discovered Gentoo Linux when I left Oracle/Sun in 2010, gave up my Mac and decided to experiment with creating a mac-like desktop experience on Linux. is supported by the community meanwhile. What is the most customizable user friendly Linux distro? A GB a month of downloads is quite possible. Alpine is compiled using Gentoo's portage, but Alpine itself uses its own apk-tools binary package which is more similar to FreeBSD's binary packages. I prefer Slackware. While you can just choose systemd, it will require some tinkering. Arch keeps its core repositories slim and free of unnecessary dependencies. What is the most portable OS in the world? These days, I use dwm, no other big stuff on a 10.5 year old laptop. Everything works fine with the make.conf default (-O2 -pipe IIRC). Even a default Arch setup offers great security with the minimum number of open ports and very little information on the system for outsiders. For example, the manual to recover your boot manager is already in the install guide! The most important reason people chose Gentoo Linux is: You build the package from a source you can see and read. Give yourself a month to learn a bit about Gentoo, although I think a year is minimum. While with AUR people who actually use the packages, provide and maintain them. What are the best Linux distributions for a backend developer? The Arch Build System allows you to compile and customize specific packages relatively easily, but if you want to set options across your entire system portage is more efficient. i have 2 machines …i use gentoo linux ….the back up machine also uses slackware, dual boot. pacman, by contrast, has relatively few options even compared to something like apt. I had never been able to use jack and non-jack audio things play nicely under Arch and always had to pick one xor the other at a time. Arch-based distros, or even Arch installers, often use unsigned repositories. It doesn't seem to be happening after running mount -a. Gentoo vs arch vs Slackware vs LFS [無断転載禁止]©2ch. My laptop couldn't dream about 6 days uptime with Arch. - A distribution such as Gentoo will always be more flexible than any binary distribution, for optimizations done at compile time. Was using systemd with Arch but when I saw the monstrosity systemd will soon become I started to search for an alternative. There are more than 19.000 packages available in the official repository. With its vast repos, Arch offers tons of applications for all kinds of use. Other than that, it'd be among my top choices for a binary-based system.. Arch does have official x86_64 packages, stated quite clearly on … You can just install any linux distro, leaving a free partition. You can change low-level system components (libc, init, compiler flags, even the package manager) much more easily on Gentoo than you can on Arch. Furthermore, as you have to configure the kernel and init system, expect some boot failures at beginning. In many cases, performance and system resource (CPU and RAM requirements, to be specific) usage are inversely proportional. The documentation is often so thorough that, when searching for solutions to problems while using other distributions, such as with video card drivers, oftentimes you'll find the most effective solution in the Arch Linux wiki or on the forums. What are the best Linux distributions for Misanthropes? I've managed Gentoo-based servers in a high-frequency financial trading environment. Unlike other some distributions, it's super simple to review the packages you download on the official arch repos or arch user repository. > enable systemd USE flag, start with openrc. What are the best rolling release Linux distributions? Just uncomment the according entries in the pacman.conf. At all. It's useful for both beginners and professionals. Gentoo does "fucking take forever to install" as its initial hurdle, being a rolling release sourced based distribution, true. When comparing Arch Linux vs Gentoo Linux, ... Pacman has performance advantages over apt-get and yum in both database operations (thanks to being written for speed) and download times (by virtue of using better mirrors than other distributions tend to select by default). Also stick to the handbook for the moment, is for your own good. Binary builds are always better for "someone else did this and it (at least vaguely) ran for them.". There are many architectures available for Gentoo : i386, x86-64, PowerPC, PowerPC 64, sparc, DEC Alpha, ARM, MIPS, PA-RISC, S390, IA-64, sh, m68k. Which Linux distribution is the best for LXDE? do not install grub, just update the one you have on arch, reboot and entern gentoo. Gentoo also officially supports systemd-free Gnome and udev. What are the best Linux distros for businesses? x86, x86_64/amd64 alpha arm hppa ia64 mips powerpc ppc64 sparc64, Source, however binarys packages are available. What are the best Linux distributions for Cinnamon? This focus, combined with the community's recognition that configuration files can be intimidating, has resulted in excellent documentation that's accessible to newcomers, and very instructive about how Linux actually works. What is the best Linux distro for the most up-to-date packages? It is not quick that way. And if you have to update the kernel or some heavy software like Chromium it can takes hours if not more on weaker hardware. Jumping into gentoo when you've never toyed with the underhood of GNU/linux is like learning to skydive without and lessons and just being pushed out - … What are the best alternatives to Debian? Unlike, for example Ubuntu where a new version is released every six months, packages are updated when they are ready. Ultimately what distro you use doesn't matter too much. You can easily install Ubuntu or even windows and have them fully up to date and drivers installed within a couple of hours depending on how fast your internet connection is. While these scripts are inherently less secure than conventional packages maintained by a distro's authors, it's still way easier to verify the security of install scripts than it would be to write them yourself. If you need a "bleeding edge" or "upstream" build of a package like WINE or Firefox. This makes it super simple to build your desired system using binary packages because there no bloat getting in your way when installing or configuring packages. Obligatory "Gentoo user of X years across Y devices" disclaimer. You definitely don't need to do that unless it's a passion. Arch is phasing out x86 support, so it is really only x86_64. Arch has the benefit of running a minimal install and you can basically build from there. There are ways to mitigate that however. This is a minor issue because most issues are often patched before the end of the day if many users rely on it, or if its a less used package there will be specific troubleshooting instructions on the arch site. While the documentation is a very valuable reference for experts, the recipes often don't actually work on your own computer. I went through the exercise of installing gentoo to try it out and play around with it. If you like to tinker with things and see how they work you don't get much better than arch linux unless you commit to building your own kernel and using flags manually when installing your packages. This way you have your build directory not on the SD card. The advantage is a very up to date system and that the work of upgrading can be spread over a longer span of time to a point where it is hardly noticeably effort. Since you do everything by hand and a LOT of it, you actually learn very useful things even for other distros. What are the best Linux distributions for beginners? Press J to jump to the feed. Then install, from the other linux distro gentoo. Portage is a package management system with a huge amount of options and features. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The repositories are nearly as full as those of Ubuntu, while they are often more up to date. The Gentoo package management system allows you to configure what compilation flags packages should support - i.e. The Arch base and all packages are only compiled for the x86_64 architecture. On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Danny YUE wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am planning to buy a Raspberry Pi 3 to setup a local network storage > and try some IoT stuff. Which means if a package has a bug that applies to all Linux distros regardless of the flavor, the maintainer may not be able to: A) catch it before pushing a update or B) have to wait for the packages developers to fix it. Okay, it's not Debian Stable or CentOS. 5:45. What are the best operating systems for a Home Theatre PC? Check if gentoo can use hard float. Two days to install an OS is insane. What are the best Linux operating systems for high performance and availability servers? Since everything is being built on your PC you can fine-tune the code to make use of your CPU. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. Arch gives great insight in the inner workings of operating systems, computers and data manipulation. Users are free to choose any init system they want. Arch Linux is actually incredibly simple. But, it all depends on the machine and what you need to use. As a result, its configuration reflects your unique taste and personality. I've used Gentoo as my daily driver for all my servers and every machine except my "gaming rig" since about 2010. The Arch Linux Wiki is very useful not just for Arch Linux users, but for anyone who uses Linux. $0.02: I like gentoo, but I'd think hard about doing all that compiling on the pi. Source-based distributions are highly portable, giving the advantage of controlling and compiling the entire OS and applications for a particular machine architecture and usage scheme, with the disadvantage of the time-consuming nature of source compilation. I mention elsewhere in this thread that zfs brought me to Gentoo. Arch seemed to have the lowest CPU idle, followed by Genoo, then Debian, but my Gentoo does seem to have a bug with the acpi connecting and disconnecting and so that may play a part. They're longer than installing binary packages but unless it's an absolute emergency it's definitely worth it, Obligatory "Gentoo user of X years across Y devices" disclaimer. What do you guys think? If you accept one of the default flags, Gentoo downloads binaries from the server. The winner is the one which gets best visibility on Google. You get better package managers with other systems. I have used both a bunch, and I always felt the opposite! Sometimes you can have a surprise, but in most cases it can be fixed quickly. Don't like Arch because lack of official x86_64 packages. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Other examples include stubbornly declaring an initramfs a last resort and an "oh my god 1337 H4XX0RZ surely have nothing better to do than trying for a month to exploit some vulnerability to steal my pony art, I have to fortify so hard my performance and ease of use will suffer" 90s security mentality. This is NOT ideal for a desktop user. The AUR is a repository with a very extensive catalogue of build/install scripts that are contributed by users. What is the best Linux distribution for the Budgie Desktop? I have a home server in my closet that runs as a "build box" for all my Gentoo machines through the house, I've personally ported Gentoo to the Sony Playstation 2, Nintendo Gamecube and Wii, Microsoft Xbox and Xbox 360, Sega Dreamcast, Hackberry A10, Raspberry Pi (the original) and the OpenVZ virtualization platform, Gentoo being sourced based makes cramming it onto new or exotic hardware an absolute breeze. There are also fewer default repositories to download from, and all package management is combined into one tool instead of being split into dpkg, apt-get, and apt-cache like on Debian distros. Gentoo’s documentation is no slouch itself, being in some respects more complete than even Arch’s documentation. Arch claims, to be a fast i686 and x86_64 distribution - and trust me, it is. ARM (kind of?) Doesn't limit you in terms of desktop environments or graphical servers (X, Wayland). In short, if you want to learn the low down deep and dark elements of a GNU/Linux system, Gentoo will get you there. What are the best Linux distributions for programming? This may be a CON for a lot of people that are new to Linux but a PRO to those who actually want to learn something new. Today's Posts; Mark Channels Read; Member List; Calendar; Forum; Software; Linux Distributions; If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. Gentoo is great if you want to hack, code, compile, etc. You can install almost any Linux from any other Linux. You don't need a source-based distribution for that. - Duration: 18:09. I'd say that in the grand scheme of things, Arch is willing to sacrifice options or choices in order to reduce complexity (which is what is meant by simplicity for the developers) while Gentoo is significantly more complex but also more flexible. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. At first installation only a bare system is set up. You deserve a lot more upvotes. Arch has no proper desktop support, you must craft your system together. You decide which features you want to build in and which aren't needed. It's actually really easy: make a new partition with a new filesystem, mount the new partition, download and extract the stage 3. start compiling the base system then the kernel, the basic file config. What is the easiest but most beneficial distribution of Linux for a beginner to start with? It's really just a partition scheme, package manager, Linux kernel, file system, systemd and the bare minimum of utilities needed to easily set up your hardware. Updating will keep the whole OS up to date (unlike Ubuntu/Debian/etc. If you have packages that need special patches, you can have them compiled in on the fly by adding the patch file in /etc/portage/patches/, Arch is a lot more rigid. Being able to set USE=alsa -pulse audio made it a keeper as I learn to compose music. Gentoo Is Not About Performance Posted Oct 31, 2009 18:16 UTC (Sat) by Cato (subscriber, #7643) [ Link ] The other great thing about Gentoo is the wiki - it has extremely detailed HOWTO pages on almost every topic you can imagine, and these are useful for almost all other distros. I like Gentoo, but it fucking takes forever to install. What are the best Linux distributions for Gnome Shell? What are the best Linux distributions for laptops? After compiling everything with --march=native and running browser performance tests, I found chromium to be slower on gentoo compared to arch system on the same laptop by a … You need to be very carefully with updates. If you want it to "just work, but with newer software" then Arch. You can choose build options, optimisation and whatever else fancy stuff you want modified. With Gentoo consider making /var/tmp/portage on USB drive. Wat betreft Gentoo vs Arch: Punkie schreef op dinsdag 04 augustus 2009 @ 22:09: Ik wil zelf niet de hele boel gaan hercompileren elke maand voor de nieuwste updates. Only if you are expert enough to know which steps to skip, to adjust or which other documentation parts to plug in, you can make it work. You can simply add it as a "keyword" in a configuration file. They are always on the bleeding edge of software releases, the difference being "compile it yourself" or "install a binary package." While the Gentoo Wiki may not cover as many “How to” type tutorials as the Arch wiki does, the Gentoo Handbook provides far more complete coverage of Linux fundamentals than anything in the Arch Wiki. You learn more about Linux by using LFS or a source based distribution. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Learn about Arch, learn about Linux. What are the best operating systems for advanced users? What are the best Linux distributions that use systemd? In conjunction with the above, all my systems run a cronned auto-update and have done so for multiple years on a single install, without developing problems or requiring manual intervention. It was eight years ago, the build time would not be the same, but if you use the modern computer, it might even take less time. Both are great! I do a lot of video encoding to H.265 to save space (while preserving quality) FFmpeg allows doing this using a supported Nvidia GPU to massively accelerate the encoding process (4 1/2 hours on a 4790 for 45 minutes of Blu Ray content reduced to a 3 minute job with a GTX 950), Enabling this in a system like Ubuntu or Arch would require manually patching FFmpeg and installing it. The Gentoo package management system allows you to configure what compilation flags packages should support - i.e. Arch Linux works quite well with low performance hardware like netbooks. I prefer Gentoo or Arch. Frankly, I am so tired of people keep saying things like that. Arch and Gentoo get compared because they are rolling releases. Things may work for the first but generally it takes days to configure a stable and working system. What is the best Linux distro for ryzen 7? The process of learning to setup and use Arch will improve your skills with Linux and computers in general. If you want really fine-grained control, Gentoo is worth it. Going in with zero Linux knowledge is not really recommended when wanting to install Arch, though it can be a good learning experience for those that are dedicated to trial and error as well as reading many faqs. Arch does not come with an automatic installation process. Well right now I am running Arch on my Pi mostly b/c when I was running Gentoo I was compiling natiavly. Debian and Arch Linux are on the extreme opposite ends of the spectrum, in pretty much all the areas. But your comment has me wanting to go back to Gentoo. If the computer becomes slow when large applications (such as LibreOffice and Firefox) run at the same time, check if the amount of RAM is sufficient. If you want it to "just work" then Ubuntu is best. Since its stripped down, it is fast and you don't have to deal with bloatware. Think about what? On the flip side portage has dozens of variables and hundreds of USE flags. While being outdated per se is virtually impossible for a rolling-release distro with a large community, a large portion of said community sticks to outdated solutions. The point of diminishing performance returns is reached … If you need to install something, chances are someone in the Arch community has already made a package for it. Additionally any system recovery required from such missed interventions is easy, just follow the wiki and make a live USB if your using a desktop or laptop. I don't think it's a lot of time. If you want "just make it work" then Arch is better. Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. Both perceived, factual and imagined. It has worked on laptops where other leading distro's like debian/ mint/ ubuntu failed to detect and work with all hardware. The usage of advanced features like USE flags makes it more customizable than any binary distribution. Apart from the ArchBuildSystem/AUR, which brings you very quickly newer package versions, there is not really much where Arch Linux shines. You are free to do whatever you want with it. Pacman has performance advantages over apt-get and yum in both database operations (thanks to being written for speed) and download times (by virtue of using better mirrors than other distributions tend to select by default). 2. Those comments assume that : A) They happen often, B) you are using a specific package with an issue, C) that package maintainers can't release a patch to the package that will work around the issue for you, and that D) Manual intervention or system recovery from such issues is hard to fix. This distro is barebones enough to make a new distro from. Out of the box Arch comes with great hardware support. gentoo vs benchmarks, gentoo vs performance data from OpenBenchmarking.org and the Phoronix Test Suite. Realistically, once you get outside of massive things like GNOME+Xorg very few of the compiles really take that long. Other facts: What are the best Linux distributions for Xfce? button. The ODROID-X was the quad-core ARM development platform being used for this cross-distribution benchmarking. You get something more consistent and doable in Arch then you would get with most other OSes. Gentoo may offer some optimizations, but open the door to more management woes, reduced mindshare, diminished vendor and driver support, stability issues, ridicule and potential security concerns. I've used Gentoo as my daily driver for all my servers and every machine except my "gaming rig" since about 2010. Arch uses a rolling release model for updates. There are extremely helpful 3rd-party installers such as Anarchy Linux (Formerly Arch Anywhere).

Applause Contact Number, Farm Shop Boroughbridge, Lalo High Chair Straps, Cetaphil Night Cream Price In Sri Lanka, Pokemon Crystal Clear Starters, Millennium Climbing Sticks Review, Samsung Galaxy A01 Core Price In Bangladesh, Iota Draconis Color, Linux Watch Process,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *